What is assumed if there is no signature on a treatment entry in a chart?

When a treatment entry in a chart lacks a signature, it is generally assumed that the treatment was provided by a dentist. This stems from the premise that, in the absence of a signature, there is no confirmation that the treatment was conducted by anyone without proper licensure. Consequently, for the entry to be valid and recognized within the established guidelines, it must be attributed to the dentist, who is responsible for oversight and the quality of care rendered.

Moreover, the signature serves as a means of accountability and traceability within dental records. In the context of dental hygiene jurisprudence, it establishes that the dentist has either performed the treatment or has assumed responsibility for a procedure documented in the records. Since the treatment entry without a signature does not directly imply the involvement of an auxiliary or indicate that the treatment was unfinished or illegitimate, the strongest assumption made is that it reflects the actions of a dentist.